And They Can’t Even Sing: On the Supremacy of the Supremes

I have a problem. I got the wrong life. Back in the day, my parents ordered me from Amazon. That’s how it was done, but I got a crappy life.

You read about this in the history books, though some tell me they are being rewritten to conceal it.

Amazon messed up. Entire groups of children went into one racial pile or another. The predominant race figured they could take advantage of those with dark skin. Many did, and many still do.

The whole thing sucked, and the suckage continues.

Gerrymandering, poor schools, discrimination, distant polling places, and more.

The system impacted even some folks who became famous.

A white guy named Samuel wanted whiteness and all that came with it. A black fellow, Clarence, would have been white but for a clerical error. You get the idea.

Once upon a time, Clarence remembered the days when he expressed gratitude for benefits to people of color that he now decries. 

According to the July 1, 2023, Washington Post:

‘God only knows where I would be today’ if not for the legal principles of equal employment opportunity measures such as affirmative action that are ‘critical to minorities and women in this society.’

‘These laws and their proper application are all that stand between the first 17 years of my life and the second 17 years,’ Thomas, then the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) chairman, said in 1983.

Ah, well, we all change our minds, don’t we? But we are stuck with a significant problem since the Supreme Court gutted the use of affirmative action for college admissions. 

They made it harder to reduce continuing unfairnesses to people of color.

But the solution to this is simple.

The Supreme Court, now the most commanding institution in the U.S., should voluntarily move into the ghetto in different locations around our fair land. Soon after, I’m sure, they will say, “Home sweet home.”

Six months ought to be enough for each one to acquire a sense of what life is like living there. Maybe add another 182 or 183 days in a middle-class neighborhood of different hues and tones.

Perhaps after that, the unique six will stop saying their legal opinions will allow disadvantaged minorities to catch up with whites quickly.

That’s a lot of ground to cover.

The six people who believe such things, with one exception, have little idea of life as a person of color.

Why? Because they’ve never lived it. The rest of the court endured some personal experiences of discrimination of different varieties: Black, Hispanic, and Jewish.

The half-dozen who voted against affirmative action comprise a club of privileged members. 

This esteemed group wishes us to think they understand the lives of those they judge as if they survived roughnecked neighborhoods and poor schools and got stopped by the police for “driving while black.”

The justices doubtless will rush to sign on to their new ghettoized existence. They will be delighted to remove their robes and become one of the guys or girls, taking small apartments to learn an essential lesson. 

The princes of the courts will soon adapt to walking a long way to find decent groceries at fair prices.

Maybe Samuel and Clarence, John and Amy, Neil and Brett will speed to tutor the local kids using a book from the public school library. Perhaps this crowd will even send their grandchildren to the same schools.

Imagine the life of a Supreme Court judge: no boss, a lifetime job with a sizeable income until he wants to retire, and friends who give him gifts or free trips ahead of cases in which they are involved.

Depending on the lawsuit and their generous buddy, the entrance to their domain ought to feature a sign:

Abandon Hope All Ye Who Enter Here

What is left? Some of these individuals act like God without godliness. Regrettably, their attitude is that justice, no matter what they decide, means “just us.”

=========

The first image is a Judicial Services Clerk’s Black Court Robe With a Pleated White Flap by ThieVale.

The U.S. Supreme Court 2011 Caricature includes Left to right around the circle. Chief Justice John G. Roberts (Chief Justice), Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, Elena Kagan, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, Clarence Thomas, and Anthony Kennedy (Center). It is the work of DonkeyHotey.

Both images are sourced from Wikimedia Commons.

One Holiday, Two Americas: Memorial Day Thoughts

Some of our fathers and brothers, even our sisters and aunts, served in wartime. Some serve now. Perhaps you too.

Today is the day we honor the fallen in all the many conflicts of this, our country.

Can two Americas fit into a holiday designed for one?

Thus do the two Americas array themselves: those for whom service is a calling and those for whom it is an economic necessity; those powerful and those without prospects; those respected and those afraid; those with fat wallets and those with empty purses; the few who are part of our volunteer army and the majority who choose not to be.

When my father did his duty in World War II, walking the Champs-Élysées on the first Bastille Day after the liberation of Paris, there was such a thing as military conscription: able bodied young men were required to participate. In post-war Germany, as part of the occupying Allied forces, he related the following in an October 19, 1945 letter to my mother:

We have two colored boys in our convoy who were carrying our postal equipment. When we went to supper … the Sargent who ran the mess hall made them eat in a separate room. The colored boys were fighting mad for which I can blame them little. I complained about this treatment to the mess Sargent, who said that the First Sargent made the rule. I went to the latter and told him off plenty (my dad was a Staff Sargent). His answer was that I didn’t have to eat in the mess hall either if I didn’t like the rules.

So this is for what we fight. I finally talked to the colored boys and pacified them somewhat.

Some of us thought we were beyond the racial animus of a time 70 years past. Not just the discrimination, but the idea of discrimination. Still, no matter our domestic troubles, we must honor the fallen. My father, who served but did not die in service, would be troubled at our regression; yet he would honor the fallen, as we all should, amid the burgers and bratwurst and beer we inhale today. In this, at least, we can still be one country, even if the ritual unites us only for a few hours.

I wrote some of this seven years ago. Other parts are new:

If you are unhappy about the polarization of our society, think about the differences institutionalized by the volunteer army’s creation. However much good was achieved by the elimination of conscription, surely the absence of shared sacrifice contributes to the ease with which we oppose our fellow-citizens.

No longer does the USA pull together in the way possible during World War II, “the Good War.” In part, “the Good War” was good because enough people believed in the values for which the USA fought, knowing their children, husbands, and brothers would defend those same values with their lives; and it was good because those at home (regardless of class) shared in the rationing of goods, the terror of having loved ones in harm’s way, the heartache of their absence, and a preoccupation with the daily progress of the conflict.

The soldiers shared something more, and more widely than the smaller fighting force of today. Men of different religions, regional accents, political opinions, and ethnicities depended on each other for their survival and discovered the “other” could be depended on, laughed at the same jokes, and partook of the common fear and dedication all brought to the war effort. Even though military segregation deprived brave blacks and Japanese Americans of the opportunity for such camaraderie except with men of the same color, the nation benefited from the portion permitted. The soldiers benefited by the love and mutual reliance of those in the same foxhole. Our fathers and grandfathers were woven together in a way we are not today.

These thoughts occurred to me as I listened (on CD) to the book Final Salute by Pulitzer Prize winning author Jim Sheeler. The volume is about the officers who inform families they have lost a loved one; and of the families who suffer the unspeakable pain of the death of a son, a husband, a wife, a brother, or a sister; a dad or a mom.

Several survivors become your acquaintances in this narrative, as well as the warriors — the Marines — who died serving our country. And you will get to know Major Steve Beck, a Marine who delivers a message nearly as shattering as the projectile that killed their loved one.

Major Beck and the Marines live by the creed of leaving no comrade behind. Consistent with this value, Major Beck leaves no family behind, providing comfort and support long after the knock on the door that changes everything, creating a “before and after” without end.

I wish I had the words to convey what is in this book. I don’t. I only will say it is plainly written, eloquent in its simplicity, aching in its beauty, profound in its impact. It does not make melodrama of what is already poignant enough. Rest assured you will contemplate war, any war, differently after reading Final Salute; unless, of course, you are a member of the “other America,” the one fighting the wars and sending its loved ones into conflict. If you belong to the bereft group within this group, then there is nothing here you do not already know at a level too deep for words.

To those who have lost just such a one as the young men portrayed in Final Salute, I can only give my condolences to you and your kin.

We — those of us in the non-fighting America, those of us for whom the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are abstractions — perhaps remain too comfortable, detached from something of desperate importance: the duty done far from home in our stead by the children of other people. And removed and distant from how the “best and brightest” of their families risk and sometimes give up everything they hold dear.

For such families, the human cost never fully goes away, for there is no inoculation against the plague of war, nor any cure.

They are out there, these inhabitants of “the other America.”

We walk past them unaware …

Once a year we give their departed a day of remembrance, if that’s what you call taking an extra day off from work, singing the National Anthem, looking at the maimed soldiers standing at attention, and then forgetting why we sang before our bottoms touch the seats. The words “play ball,” don’t quite capture a sentiment of honor or atonement, do they?

==================================================================================================================================================

All the images above are sourced from Wikimedia Commons. 1. “Vice Admiral Scott Swift, Director of Navy Staff holds Savannah Wriglesworth of Bowie, Maryland during a group photo with families of the Tragedy Assistance Program for Survivors (TAPS) before taking a tour at the Pentagon May 23, 2014. The children of fallen U.S. service members toured the Pentagon seeing different exhibitions from the Navy, Army, Marine Corps and Air Force including Klinger the horse. Klinger has served at more than 5,000 military funerals and has a book published about him called “Klinger: A Story of Honor and Hope” and is often a warm and comforting face for the children to see when making their final good-byes.” (Department of Defense photo by Erin A. Kirk-Cuomo). 2. and 3. The work of Allstrak. 4. “Arizona Diamondbacks first baseman Paul Goldschmidt looks on during the singing of the National Anthem before his squad’s Memorial Day Major League Baseball matchup against the San Diego Padres at Chase Field in Phoenix, May 26, 2014. U.S. Marine Corps Sgt. Brandon Kidd, right, was on hand to represent the United States Marine Corps during pre-game dedications.” (U.S. Marine Corps photo by Sgt. Tyler J. Bolken).