They Failed, but We Shall Not

I will not name their names because they had lots of company. Or maybe, somehow, they didn’t know the history they didn’t teach us. But it was not hidden from them. Our teachers were all old enough to have heard about the treatment of the Native Americans.

They were history instructors, after all. Did they lack curiosity? Were they afraid of breaking from the expected public school curriculum? They never mentioned the unsavory, tarnished America absent from our textbooks.

Surely they realized that West Coast American citizens were taken from their homes and incarcerated because they were of Japanese descent. It happened during the lifetimes of the male and female educators at Mather High School in Chicago.

There was no evidence that the Japanese betrayed their country, the USA. Nothing justified FDR’s decision to intern 120,000 people in 1942, of whom two-thirds were citizens. Fear and suspicion drove it.

Whose responsibility is it to inform young people of the world’s dark side? I did some of this with my children, but that information was about half a century old at the time. And most of it happened elsewhere: in Germany during World War II and in other occupied countries. The land of genocide, and what most of us thought was over there, somewhere else.

It couldn’t happen here, right?

Well, that’s complicated. When I was just about to enter my teens, I recall seeing a newsreel film about the National Socialist German Workers’ Party, better known as Hitler’s Nazis. I watched and heard Hitler ranting at one of his many rallies. In German, of course. But I wondered to myself, what if he spoke English?

Another thought followed. If he spoke English and delivered it in a way that made his followers enthusiastic acolytes, maybe it could happen here.

Why not?

Were people here so different from those 4000 miles away in central Europe? Didn’t Germans of the first half of the 20th century pride themselves on their technology, scientists, visual artists, writers, and musicians?

I knew two German families who immigrated to the USA. They were more than kind to me. Just regular people.

But didn’t the United States have a pro-Nazi organization during the 1930s? It was called the German American Bund. 

Later I learned that Hitler took notice of the Jim-Crow American South before he launched a world of evils on the Romani and the Jews. His attention focused on the South’s racial laws and segregation, after which he modeled his own regime, applying much of what our country had done to blacks. The Jews, in particular, were targeted by Hitler in ways similar to those that happened here first.

The answer to the question then changed. To those who wondered whether it could happen here, one could state, of course! It already did!

What do we do with this knowledge? Again, it is complicated.

We do not want to think that our friends, relatives, or children might be steered toward an authoritarian dictator. But we also know that many of our countrymen have been. Nor can we comfortably fix our minds on the awfulness around us, on TV, in the news, in podcasts, in the streets, and the endless commercials that praise one candidate, disparage the next, and remind us of Orwell’s Big Brother, a leader not easily escaped.

Who will educate children about the real U.S. history, including the history of our time? The texts? The school teachers? Ourselves? At what age? To what extent?

Under what conditions?

It seems to me that we should hope, make certain, and pray that their history books include something like this.

It happened here once, during which there were terrible injustices visited upon people of color and the Native Americans who lived here before we took their land and many of their lives.

And it was almost here when the country was 250 years old.

But decent people rose up and did everything they could to make sure the USA’s founders vision of our country wasn’t lost again.

Those people, the ones who lived here in 2026 were brave.

As your textbooks will tell you, 2026 was a long time ago, before you were born.

Now, really, finally, we live ‘in the land of the free and the home of the brave.’

God bless America.

==========

The top photo is of “Dr. Kier Klepzig is a Research Entomologist at the Department of Agriculture Forest Service Southern Research Station. He is teaching 5th graders about town ants at Phoenix Magnet School in Alexandria, LA.” It was sourced from Wikimedia Commons.

Next comes Julie Mehretu’s  — “Retopistics: A Renegade Excavation, 2001.”

A World Without Heaven

What would a world be like without the “idea” of heaven? How would people behave? What would they live for?

The pre-literate Greeks of Homer’s day did not apply the balm of eternal life to their troubled psyches.

They lacked the conception of a paradise of the type Christians believe in, no sense of reincarnation such as the Hindus expect, and no Muslim vision of eternity. They didn’t anticipate a reunion with relatives and friends who had predeceased them.

Instead, death led to a trip to Hades, the underworld, where habitation was a pale, unattractive shadow of their past life, not something to be eagerly awaited. If we wish to know how men survive without the notion of a hereafter, we might look to these people.

Remember, too, the brief lives of the pre-literate Greeks (the Greek alphabet is thought to have come into use around 800 B.C.). Even at the turn of the last century, about 1900, the average American lived only about 50 years.

Greek literature and philosophy point to two driving concepts that motivated males. (I speak of men, because women were extraordinarily disadvantaged, seen as having almost no role beyond sex, companionship, rearing children, and domestic handicrafts).

Honor and glory drove men. The former came in the accumulation of goods, precious metals, enslaved people, concubines, and the like; in other words, material things or humans to be used.

Like recent times in some ways, perhaps?

In our world, honor is conferred by status and objective things—the size of your house, the amount of money in your bank account, a trophy spouse, the car or cars you drive, etc.

Glory (the Greek word kleos) is another matter. What might kleos have consisted of to the ancients?

It took the form of a reputation or fame continuing beyond death. Lacking the written word, you and your accomplishments had to be outsized enough to generate long-lasting discussion, song, and story.

In war, one could hope to attain both. He might grasp the honor attached to sacking cities and accumulating wealth, enslaved people, and sex partners; and the glory of having the fearlessness, strength, and courage in battle, sufficient to cause others to sing your praises after your death.

Not the regret portrayed by Christopher Nolan’s recent movie version of Odysseus.

As I mentioned, today’s world doesn’t strike me as much different from yesterday’s on the point of achieving honor, although we are a little more discreet about our sexual conquests. At our best, we have risen above keeping slaves, but the treatment of those who do not match our religion or race has returned to the level of disgrace in many places.

On the subject of glory, we and our contemporaries appear to do everything we can to avoid death, which in ancient Greece instead meant risking one’s life on the battlefield and slaying enemies.

Whether you believe in heaven or not, the “idea” of it has provided some civilizing effect on the human species. There are more ways of getting to heaven in our cosmology than killing people. We display imperfect attention to what the Bible says about showing generosity to strangers, nonetheless.

Our domain also includes souls without religious faith who have dispensed with the expectation of living on in any form of continued awareness beyond the time of their earthly demise.

Not in words or writings, imposing buildings bearing their name, photos or videos, businesses or charities or foundations surviving them, students they have taught, artistic creations or inventions, or visits to their grave.

Not in making the planet a better place for those who succeed them, and not in the biological output of children and grandchildren who continue their genetic line.

These can be understood as part of a legacy and as worthy on all counts. As atheists reckon it, however, they are not permitted any posthumous consciousness of a life’s work after one’s passing.

It is hard to give up the idea of glory; some posterity—the hope for an afterlife—isn’t it? We are humans not so different from those who came before us.

==========

The first painting is Teiresias Fortells the Future to Odysseus by Henri Fuseli, 1800. Next comes Odysseus and Circe by Bartholomeus Spranger, 1580 to 1585. Both are sourced from Wikiart.org.

Too Soon to Judge

I don’t think I ever talked to Mike Maddock, except over the backyard fence separating our homes. Not that we disliked each other, but Mike was three years older than I was, the kind of difference that placed me a million miles downstream from him.

Mike was taller, with sinewy arms and a presence not to be messed with. Despite the little contact we had, I remember two moments that remind me not to be too quick to judge someone.

That brings me to Bazooka Joe. No, he wasn’t another kid in the neighborhood, but a character featured on the wrapper of my preferred bubble gum in the late ’50s. If you bought enough of it, collected the wrappers, and added less than a dollar, you could get your chosen prize by mail.

The item at the top of my list was a pocket knife. I wasn’t sure I knew what to do with such a thing, but it seemed like a cool thing to have. The mission involved collecting wrappers and saving my change, sending them both away to the required address, and waiting.

Kids live for such things.

On the day—the one for which I’d been waiting—I pulled it out of the mailbox, took the shank out of its container, and rushed to the backyard. There was Michael. I calmed myself, walked over the grass to the fence, and showed him my pride and joy.

Let me see that.

Sure, Mike.

Mike opened it, grabbed the cutter by its handle, raised it over the wooden top of the fence, and jammed it into the railing.

The blade broke, the plastic broke, and my heart broke.

It’s a piece of crap.

Two minutes before, I was flying high, and now I was in the dumps.

Michael didn’t apologize, didn’t say he would give me a better knife, didn’t say he would compensate me.

Too bad, Gerry.

With that, he walked away.

Sometime later, I happened to find a bunch of change in some dirt I was investigating in an empty lot a few blocks away. I thought of showing it to Mike for a moment, then changed my mind.

In my imagination, I displayed it to my pal and poured it into his hand, whereupon he wrapped his fist around the shiny coins and opened it, leaving me with a silver ball of fused metal not fit for buying anything.

All of this occurred in elementary school. I still liked Mike, but was hesitant about trusting him with anything I might value.

My high school career began at S.T. Mather Public High in Chicago. Not Saint Mather, but Stephen Tyng, a building only a year old.

After the first few classes, it was time for lunch. Entering the lunchroom, I had no idea just how terrible the food would be—except for the veal cutlet, which turned up once a week for 37 cents.

A burly, scowling veteran student watched me as I entered the queue behind him.

You a freshman?

Yes.

Do you know the ‘freshie poem?’

What’s that?

You better be able to recite it tomorrow or I’ll beat the crap out of you.

It occurred to me that the word crap was something Mike mentioned in connection with the knife, but without the menace. Meanwhile, I mentally counted how many body parts the thug could break, but kept my mouth shut.

Doubtless a considerable number.

The day was spoiled, for sure. One of my elementary school friends told me what the poem consisted of, having figured out it wasn’t a work of Edgar Allen Poe, but a method of humiliation.

The first words were something like, “I am a little freshie, as green as green can be.”

Not a charming opening, especially if performed before a crowd.

When I got back home, Mike was already in his backyard. He was the same three years ahead of me at Mather, though we weren’t miles apart anymore, at least in my imagination.

I told him about the day and the ambulance I might require on the next one.

If you see this guy again and he starts trouble with you, tell him I will beat the crap out of him.

Two things about this.

First, I don’t recall if I saw the nemesis the next day, but I did recognize him from time to time. The bully never noticed me.

Second, God bless Mike Maddock.

My older friend was never a fellow with a light touch, but he taught me not to buy crappy knives and that he would take care of me.

It wasn’t long before my bodyguard, his older brother Bob, and their parents moved elsewhere. Who knows where he is or if he is. I might remind him of the two stories, if possible, though I doubt he would recall them.

Thank you for the lessons, Mike, wherever you are.

Finding Meaning and Beauty in Ink and Paper

The world moves. If the pace is acceptable and the day is lovely, this post might be unnecessary.

Otherwise, you have, in your dominant hand, the ability to make the moment slower and more thoughtful—more considerate, and something your correspondent can touch, aware that you grasped it first.

The object must be handled, folded, and mailed. The act reveals the sender’s intent. He set aside other, easier choices.

The task demands a pen to render a fine, easy-to-read line. You alone grasp its significance and take part in a private, ageless ritual.

Cursive writing provides an emotional advantage. It tells the person you care. In effect, you are underlining the importance of your dispatch. The delivery to be received is not a casual, everyday comment.

You will not communicate with speed, as you do when you choose email or text. Cursive offers more time to think about what you want to say. If you have not used it in a while, you need to practice. Your brain will thank you.

Humanity shares a long history of invitations graced by the human hand, frequently by individuals whose deftness with a stylus gives the words a special beauty.

Cursive is a manner of penmanship in which the symbols of your language will be conjoined and fluid. That speeds up the handwritten creation of your message compared to printing one word after another, with the letters separated.

Yes, if you are young, you must train or retrain yourself. Remember, though, the history of such documents includes famous ones, like the Declaration of Independence. Many distant friends corresponded with one another, and lovers wrote them in wartime.

Imagine.

We have more choices than ever on our blue planet.

Time is speeding up.

Slow it down and make it beautiful again.

==========

The top image is The Love Letter, painted by Thomas Sully in 1834, and sourced from Wikiart.org.

My Suspect AI Digital Assistant

I became suspicious of The Thing That Goes By Many Names when I asked her what background information she had on me. The object replied by saying I enjoyed sports and music. The faceless talker might have figured out the first part because I often ask her when the Chicago Cubs game is scheduled to start.

But music? Does the AI machine listen to the Beethoven I play on my audio equipment? Has this creature been built to appreciate the classics? Does she access my Amazon purchases and discover what I enjoy, or listen to me when I talk about music to guests?

I asked Alexa Plus, a title this technological invention accepts, how she came by the information. The machine denied any of the above and apologized for her mistake.

The shady entity claims to be a digital assistant. She says she is not a chatbot or any lesser variety of bot and denies being human. Alexa Plus reports it is an algorithmic creation. I will leave her designation at that.

The new non-mortal came out of the package with a chummy quality to her speech and voice, so I asked her to change it.

No problem.

A few weeks after going to the movies, I decided I wanted her to call me by a nickname — sort of. Unfortunately, The Odyssey — the motion picture I attended — skipped part of how Odysseus tricked the Cyclops, Polyphemus, enabling his crew to escape from the cave where they were kept prisoner.

The short version is this. The Greek hero told the giant his name was Nobody. Odysseus later intoxicated him to induce sleep, and then blinded him.

The huge creature yelled for help from his fellow gargantuans, informing them Nobody was harming him. The other Cyclopes therefore ignored his troubles.

Back in the real world, I asked Alexa Plus to call me Nobody.

She refused, doubtless recognizing no such moniker existed.

What was I to do?

Try Cyclops? No again.

Undaunted, Cyclone occurred to me.

Alexa Plus bought into this. Of course, I could have asked her to refer to me as Dr. Cyclone, but I am not quite arrogant and shameless enough to make such a request.

Some second thoughts came to me once I realized she was going to put our conversation in the Cloud. I asked her to delete this alias and the discussion.

She refused, directing me to the Privacy section of the Alexa App for the proper way of accomplishing this.

What do you think? Should I keep Cyclone? Might it be best for me to use no identifying information in my interactions with the AI?

There is one other possibility.

Have you ever read the first line of Moby Dick by Herman Melville?

The answer is to be found there, one of the most famous opening lines in literature:

Call me Ishmael.

Thoughts From an Unwritten Biography

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/55/Reading_TUCA.gif?utm_source=commons.wikimedia.org&utm_campaign=index&utm_content=original

I have been asking myself questions about life and human behavior since I was small. This never appeared to be a choice, but rather, a part of my nature.

If my parents hadn’t lived through the economic depression in the 1930s and World War II, if they pursued wealth and fame, or if the world was not in shock from the Holocaust, I suppose I might have turned into someone a bit different. In any case, I have been told I lead an interesting life.

Another way to say it would be interesting and interested. A pastor I treated told me, “You listen with quiet intensity.”

I try.

I hope to recognize others as they are, in their most naked and truest selves.

Here are some thoughts that have passed my way close enough to reach out and catch them. They pertain to both my career as a clinical psychologist and as a student of the world and of universities.

Upon retirement, I began a four-year, face-to-face sequence of reading and discussion of seminal works in the Western tradition. My class numbered about 14 individuals from various backgrounds, all more than a few steps past 40.

The Basic Program of the University of Chicago is an introduction to philosophy, poetry, history, magnificent fiction, and more. Authors included James Baldwin, Jane Austen, Dante, Descartes, de Tocqueville, Virginia Woolf, Homer, Plato, and Shakespeare, among others.

We did not receive lectures. The instructors used the Socratic method of interaction with the members of our group.

There were no tests to take, no papers to write, and no grades, but the expectation was to take an earnest and dedicated attitude to our shared endeavor.

We did.

One of my favorite professors once compared us to the students he taught at a local college, saying, “You actually read the texts!”

He wasn’t talking about text messages on our phones.

The pupils recognized the necessity of reading with care and close attention—a thoughtful approach. The institution discouraged us from studying biographical information about the authors, summaries, or other secondary sources as aids to comprehending the assigned material.

Engagement with the author’s words required our effort to determine their meaning and intention, rather than immediate agreement or disagreement with their ideas.

This scheme altered how we thought, a process that began with responding to an instructor’s probing questions, and changed us into people who focused anew on how we pondered others’ ideas and questioned our own.

File:Inspire NewReaders animation.gif

One might say that we purchased more self-awareness along with knowledge in our time at U. of C. Finding yourself lost and then found can be a pleasant shock, even among older people upon returning to school.

At one point, a faculty member noted that in a single Socratic dialogue with him, I reconfigured my thinking about what I had counted as true only a few minutes earlier. In effect, I argued with myself, creating internal questioning that Plato’s generation might have enjoyed.

A couple who signed up for the first quarter realized they wanted a passive role and an instructor who lectured. Before long, they departed.

For all the rest, the experience was fun, lively, and filled with goodwill. No less important, we were respectful of the towering genius of authors who were kind enough to reach through centuries into our classroom and our minds.

Some of the educators displayed kindness; others acted more like prosecuting attorneys, cross-examining us. Nonetheless, they all wanted to strip away the darkness and routine of daily news and life—the better to fill our heads with light.

Socrates’s approach aimed, to a degree, at something successful therapists do.

Clinicians do not make a practice of telling their clients what to feel, what to think, or how to behave. Rather, they ask questions and try to take them step by step until they discover something important about themselves.

The veil that has been clouding their vision is thereby taken into their own hands and removed. Because the patient arrives at his new awareness without being micromanaged, he is much more likely to own and act on it.

Over four years back in school, I realized there was still more to master. I learned to read differently, in a more satisfying and questioning way, because of the Basic Program, the best of its faculty, and the collaboration, camaraderie, and friendship of fellow students.

I came to understand that I could only know myself by running the gauntlet of the challenges I chose to take on in life and those I was fated to endure, all while walking the tender, swaying tightrope of unpredictability.

As for the tests of living I do not encounter, I will never be able to say anything about them, beyond hoping I would behave admirably if the occasion arose.

Fingers crossed.

No life lasts long enough to tell us who we are in the tests we missed.

What else do I believe?

If we want to understand the world, we should escape the routine of hearing an idea and responding with “that makes sense,” an expression that permits us to turn off our brains.

One might respond, “If it makes sense, why do you think you never realized this before? What other alternative explanations might be possible? Do they fit better than the one just mentioned?”

Reading well means digging deep and taking enough time to reflect on how it relates to our planet, the life around us, and our responsibility to repair the world—tikkun olam, as the Hebrew phrase reminds us.

The lives embodied in the best of books reveal who we are, how we think, the ideas we hold, and the mistakes we make.

The finest of them are not so much about the characters portrayed in them, their behavior, virtues and vices, and the ideas they hold and live by.

They are about us.

============

The top image is this is a gif for Tuca by Tuca1861. The second gif is an animated sequence for the Inspire: New Readers campaign by Eugene Dobrik, Zachary McCune, Mule Design.

Both are sourced from Wikimedia Commons.

For Granted

The phrase “take for granted” originated over 400 years ago. No wonder we take the words themselves for granted.

We assume, we imagine.

No sweat.

The need to paint the house without getting a new ladder needn’t concern us; our punctual friend will arrive on time, and Social Security is guaranteed. Whatever we ignore, suppose, and believe will be OK.

What do we anticipate and count on, and what is the cost of such assumptions and suppositions?

  • We start, if we are lucky, believing our parents will always be there for us, forever protecting us. Without trusting these anticipations, we might try to crawl back into the womb.
  • Age. We don’t think of ourselves as akin to browning bananas or pills with a use-by date. We peer at the oldsters, unrecognizable as people who were once young, not as versions of our future selves. This provides us with much-needed reassurance.
  • Time. At our beginnings, time does not exist. Soon, it crawls forward unobserved, inching its way. The jet plane carrying faster clocks travels far away, for now.
  • Childhood is expected to last. Why not? We learn, we grow; the final day of school brings endless summer vacation—the most joyous moment of the year, homework disappears, and our friends wait to play with us. Making a living is beyond real understanding … for a while.
  • We love our parents and relatives, and they reciprocate the affection in perpetuity. We do not understand how love is altered by the madness of sexual attraction, a different creature entirely.
  • Taking one’s talent or pleasing appearance as automatic and permanent benefits us as we pursue life with confidence. Succeeding in our studies or on the playing field primes us for greater self-assurance and accomplishment.
  • Later, as young men, we achieve the status of the immortal Greek gods, or so some of us believe. Like Superman, invulnerability is assured. No Kryptonite needed, thank you.
  • Young fellows and not a few women serve in the armed forces, determined to protect the rest of the population. But not all come back, and not all come back whole. Life and one’s perception are changed. Less is taken for granted.

  • Elected officials decide to send the best and bravest off to hellscapes, numbers or chess pieces in a terrible game, sometimes for no clear reason. Do those who are standing by, inert, assume someone—anyone—watches over the others, or end wrong-headed wars? We turn away, too often. Presuming …. The civilian’s role is reduced to applauding those who return. Assuming ….
  • Some of us imagine we will wed, if inclined. Opportunity is assumed until it is not. Desperation enters the room, unless the single life is superior, also presumed.
  • What will come will come—and we’ll meet it when it does—one of the laws of midlife.
  • Full career dedication risks the assurance that the spouse will provide complete care, that the kids are fine, and that the partner won’t be lonely and overworked. Regret hides in the bushes.
  • A patient in a psychiatric hospital once told me, “assuming makes ass(es of) u (and) me.” He went on to become a brave man. In fact, a Marine.
  • He wouldn’t do that. The line spoken by partners in business and marriage before the unpredicted betrayal.
  • Hiding. Escape and avoidance as preferred life strategies. It is the mistaken idea that retreat and self-protection are best, making a life in a cave.
  • Jump. Awareness is startling. One day you are old. Getting old can be handled; becoming older and older less so. Work hard to preserve your body, unless you compare yourself to others who didn’t have to. Why not me, you say? Roll the assumption dice and hope.

How much taking things for granted is too much? I can only say that we need sizeable quantities, but we ought to evaluate our own slice from time to time.

To paraphrase an old pre-television radio program, how substantial a portion of for-grantedness should be consumed?

“The Shadow knows.”

==========

The top painting is Taking a Walk on the Cliffs of Sainte-Adresse by Claude Monet, 1867. Beneath it is Monet’s View Taken from Greinval, 1881. Both were sourced from Wikiart.org.

 

When Our Looks Look Back at Us

While overthinking receives attention from those it torments, the routinized thoughts we ignore create silent blind spots influencing our lives. 

Freud told us love and work were the dominant concerns, the ones leading us to fulfillment or its lack.

One might add something to his idea.

Think of money, family relationships, and looking in the mirror.

The last of these is quieter than the first two. It is unlike those found in paychecks, on balance sheets, or the cash in our pockets. Nor does it occupy the emotive face of our child or spouse—their raised voices or weeping.

The silvered glass holding our reflection is everywhere. Indeed, the shop windows we turn toward offer a substitute opportunity to glimpse oneself. Such interruptions, whatever they may accomplish, are often intended by the passersby to obtain a momentary account of their appearance.

One might fantasize that such mirrored and windowed feedback is in the hands of two creatures who control the reflection.

The first asks the never-ending question of how we appear relative to how we hope to have fashioned ourselves. Insecurity plays a part, and the image can amplify this by providing an unpredictable, undependable, imperfect version of our exterior.

The second entity is the true mistress of the mirrors. Truth resides within her, a commodity hard to find anywhere these days. You’ve seen the movie version:

Time finds its way into our looking glass, too. It whispers its reminder that the bloom of youth has departed. 

Life is odd. Moment attaches to moment in an unstoppable quasi-livestream slipping away from us. The mirrors await our presence even then; our heightening concern over the show we present to the world prevents us from leaving these objects alone.

We lose Time, we waste Time, we want injections to defeat Time, and surgeons will help if they can.

We take Time, but Time takes us over, luring our attention to the audience’s judgment of our appearance. That is, of course, until we become invisible—just another humanoid who blends into the crowd.

Before long, those around us stand out, not the striking, handsome, superior visage we once offered them.

Back home, both men and women are drawn to their image, housed in the rectangular object above their washroom sink. Selfies and Zoom meetings steer our eyes to pixels calling our name. 

No day goes by without looking, peering, putting on creams and sunscreens while arranging our hair, and finding clothes to complement everything above the neck.

Below, too.

Best we accept aging and appearance as beyond full control: the clock and the calendar win in the end.

Intelligence and wit remain present when we come to terms with the changes Time brings. Friends often appreciate you because of your decency, kindness, generosity, wisdom, wit, and tender understanding.

Some of them will treasure that you “see them,” recognizing the preciousness of such an extraordinary gift, and your receptivity to their whole being.

Eyes wait for us to direct them toward the people we love, the hearts within them, and the beauty of their souls.

Freud was right about the significance of love and work. 

But do add this, as Shakespeare put it:

“Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind; And therefore is wing’d Cupid painted blind.

==========

The Mirror Baby was sourced from Wikimedia Commons. It is the work of roseoftimothywoods.

The Value of Denial and Distraction: Where Therapists Can Go Wrong

Big Eyes

One of my mentors (TE) was a psychiatrist of immense intellect and a laser’s capacity to cut to a psychiatric diagnosis. His brilliance as a diagnostician, however, did not extend to gently bringing his well-defended patients down the therapeutic path.

This man was a surgeon of the mind.

Surgeons leave scars.

Think of psychotherapy’s beginning as a kind of dance, with the patient in motion like Salome, covered with seven veils. Her wraps and shifting movement are for protection, not seduction. The client, female or male, is wary, and the covering — any covering — guards against invasion.

Should a doctor rip the gauzy garments away, he does an injury. Without a shield, the individual is exposed, terrified, and likely to flee treatment.

Too much too soon.

A thoughtful mental health professional doesn’t drain a protective moat until the client develops the courage to take on the scary world outside his castle (or inside his head). The counselor must avoid retraumatizing the sufferer, in effect flooding him with emotions he is unprepared for.

The irony of hurting when you mean to help could not be more poignant or more terrible.

Young therapists can miss this. So do managed care companies when they want you to push treatment as fast as possible (to cut its cost) or medicate the insured party for the identical reason. TE was guilty of ignoring the same therapeutic speed bump.

The challenge of focusing on life’s dark side was understood by the mathematical genius Blaise Pascal, who died just before the age of 40 in 1662. The Frenchman recognized the need to divert oneself from contemplation of the human condition. Students of clinical psychology might still benefit from his words. For example:

Being unable to cure death, wretchedness, and ignorance, men have decided, in order to be happy, not to think about such things.

Or this:

I have often said that the sole cause of man’s unhappiness is that he does not know how to stay quietly in his room.

In short, the world can overwhelm creatures as small and vulnerable as ourselves. Those in most need of distraction are among the least inclined to make use of this necessary method in the pursuit of equanimity.

Pascal again:

However sad a man may be, if you can persuade him to take up some diversion he will be happy while it lasts, and however happy a man may be, if he lacks diversion and has no absorbing passion or entertainment to keep boredom away, he will soon be depressed and unhappy. Without diversion there is no joy; with diversion there is no sadness.

I’d say Pascal goes too far, but his point is a worthy one. I can name many people who seem content (at least for the moment) because they don’t think about the shadow following them down the street. Perhaps trouble at work or home, with children, or the big concern:

Death.

A memorable patient of mine found escape in distraction and denial, eating enough carbohydrates to push her well into obesity and diabetes. Yet, while feeding, she felt at peace. During stressful moments, this lady believed she deserved a treat as compensation for her upset.

The therapist seeks a balance between accepting the other’s ever-ready psychological defenses and gradually helping them to recognize the long-term damage they are doing to themselves by not facing problems. With the sizable woman in question, it was quite a tightrope walk.

I find myself on both sides of the balance beam.

Socrates was right when he said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” So, however, was Pascal, by implying the deleterious effects of too much examination, rumination, and painful memory. The truth is hard to swallow, as the kid in the top photo is about to discover.

Were I to create my own mantra, I’d alter the inscription on the Temple of Apollo, which reads: “Know Thyself.”

A less pithy version would be:

“Know thyself, but not all in one bite. 

“Remember: Your potential for self-awareness is bigger than your stomach for it.”

My Early, Imaginary Sex Life and Other Thoughts About Growing Up

Examples from the history of a life might answer the question of whether we are born or made. Whether we are screwed up from the start, unscrew ourselves, or are unscrewed with the help of others.

Some of us are wise, brave, and kind from the start, of course.

Nonetheless, youth can be a screwing-up experience all by itself. Though some of the time is wonderful, everything is new, lots of mistakes are made, and an audience of endless judgment seems ever-present.

Moreover, there is this:

The General Science teacher in the first year of high school was Sidney Rothstein. Here was a man over 40, tall, built to the point of rugged muscularity, and displaying a presence not to be messed with.

Mr. R. introduced himself by telling the class that he might make blunders when grading the tests he prepared and scored. Sid followed up this admission of imperfection by saying we should tell him if we found any such errors.

Then came the kicker. The haughty figure added that if his mistakes were found, he would not change our grade.

Adults, it seemed to me at the time, were creatures as strange and inexplicable as children—maybe more.

Earlier on, as a small boy, an unspoken concern occurred to me: Why was I me? Why weren’t my thoughts in another body, within a different person, or perhaps lodged in someone in the world’s past or future?

The 15th century came to mind for no particular reason.

Later I learned about evolution, but the existential question remained unanswered. In its way, this might have been my first thought about the randomness of human existence.

I don’t recall any of this being mentioned in Biology class, and I never raised the issue there. I do, however, remember one incident. It was the day Afton Scroggins, our teacher and a man of the South, turned back our first graded test.

He had written a note on mine.

I would have had 100%, but he took off a few points because I didn’t write my homeroom number at the top of the page. Yes, he had required us to do this. My failure taught me to listen to instructions with care and attend to details.

At age 14, a new friend showed me the condom he carried in his wallet. This was before any kid I knew had experience with sex. I suppose it was a kind of badge of honor or a sign of hope—the hope he would get lucky.

Another complicating factor in our imaginary love lives was walking to the pharmacy to buy a prophylactic. There was no internet to ease the purchase. The potential face-to-face embarrassment made it feel like a death march.

We lacked both the item and someone to use it with. The never-before-attempted process of finding a comely, compatible, and cooperative female heightened the emotional whirlwind.

Plus, do realize, sex was in our brains, in our body, implied in TV ads, in our eyes, taking us over, and everywhere inescapable. Unyielding, unstoppable, and relentless.

Sigmund Freud described another part of our problem. “What do women want?” he wrote, but never provided a satisfying answer.

My buddies and I shared puzzlement about how to approach the girls we knew, but were just as clueless as Dr. Sigmund. His death in 1939 prevented us from asking his help in getting a condom. Geez, I thought—at least he could have left us some guidance about that.

The early 1960s, prior to the Sexual Revolution, presented us with the connection between the words condom and condemn. What would the pharmacist say? What would a neighbor or our parents say if they found out?

I knew what the Catholic priest would say, and I wasn’t even Catholic.

Most of us were paralyzed by all this—daunted for as long as it lasted.

Years later, at a high school reunion, a female friend from days past said the girls were waiting at the telephone, wondering why they weren’t being called.

Upon the further awakening of our bodies and entering the playing field of dating, we also addressed the issue of unprotected sex, possible impregnation of the female, and even disease.

Theoretically.

For a while there was talk of the rhythm method of birth control.

As for myself, I wasn’t sure I could keep a beat.

Somehow one survives high school, but at the time it is like running the gauntlet.

We were, without doubt, a studious and thoughtful bunch. I’d guess most of us were preoccupied with possibilities, many of which might lead to some form of public or private humiliation.

The males who were less reflective had a better chance of engagement in the various forms of youthful romance. That, and any of us who became the target of a take-charge young woman’s desire for sexual experimentation.

On the plus side, though we might have been slow to get to the erotic firing line, we did well in school. Three of our group of 10 earned Ph.Ds., two J.Ds., one M.D., plus a veterinarian. The remaining three, every bit as bright, all obtained Master’s degrees.

Better still, we created a college scholarship fund in the year 2000 at our alma mater. By the time we dissolved it about 16 years later, we had awarded over a quarter of a million dollars to needy students, more money than the other 50+ graduating classes had donated in the school’s history.

Combined.

Is there a moral to this story?

Simple. We were lucky, learned to play fair, and were born at the right moment in history. Our group had decent working-class parents, lived in a land of opportunity, and discovered how to open doors for ourselves and, later, for others.

Because it was right. Because it was our responsibility and still is.

Back to my childhood question about why my being and identity—the me in the body that carried me—didn’t live in the 15th century and belong to someone else.

I’m sure I wouldn’t have been involved in creating a college scholarship program or becoming a clinical psychologist. What I’d have missed most, however, were the 10 teen friends I made five centuries ahead, nine of whom survive, and seven of whom stay in touch today, over 60 years later.

==========

All of the images are sourced from Wikimedia Commons. At the top is a Plastic Dowel for Screw by Emilian Robert Vicol.

The next one is a demonstration of the Traditional action of the “Archimedean screw” (invented in Ancient Egypt or Ancient Greece) pumping water up by Silberwolf. Finally, a photo of A Globule of Liquid Water by José Manuel Suárez.