When Our Looks Look Back at Us

While overthinking receives attention from those it torments, the routinized thoughts we ignore create silent blind spots influencing our lives. 

Freud told us love and work were the dominant concerns, the ones leading us to fulfillment or its lack.

One might add something to his idea.

Think of money, family relationships, and looking in the mirror.

The last of these is quieter than the first two. It is unlike those found in paychecks, on balance sheets, or the cash in our pockets. Nor does it occupy the emotive face of our child or spouse—their raised voices or weeping.

The silvered glass holding our reflection is everywhere. Indeed, the shop windows we turn toward offer a substitute opportunity to glimpse oneself. Such interruptions, whatever they may accomplish, are often intended by the passersby to obtain a momentary account of their appearance.

One might fantasize that such mirrored and windowed feedback is in the hands of two creatures who control the reflection.

The first asks the never-ending question of how we appear relative to how we hope to have fashioned ourselves. Insecurity plays a part, and the image can amplify this by providing an unpredictable, undependable, imperfect version of our exterior.

The second entity is the true mistress of the mirrors. Truth resides within her, a commodity hard to find anywhere these days. You’ve seen the movie version:

Time finds its way into our looking glass, too. It whispers its reminder that the bloom of youth has departed. 

Life is odd. Moment attaches to moment in an unstoppable quasi-livestream slipping away from us. The mirrors await our presence even then; our heightening concern over the show we present to the world prevents us from leaving these objects alone.

We lose Time, we waste Time, we want injections to defeat Time, and surgeons will help if they can.

We take Time, but Time takes us over, luring our attention to the audience’s judgment of our appearance. That is, of course, until we become invisible—just another humanoid who blends into the crowd.

Before long, those around us stand out, not the striking, handsome, superior visage we once offered them.

Back home, both men and women are drawn to their image, housed in the rectangular object above their washroom sink. Selfies and Zoom meetings steer our eyes to pixels calling our name. 

No day goes by without looking, peering, putting on creams and sunscreens while arranging our hair, and finding clothes to complement everything above the neck.

Below, too.

Best we accept aging and appearance as beyond full control: the clock and the calendar win in the end.

Intelligence and wit remain present when we come to terms with the changes Time brings. Friends often appreciate you because of your decency, kindness, generosity, wisdom, wit, and tender understanding.

Some of them will treasure that you “see them,” recognizing the preciousness of such an extraordinary gift, and your receptivity to their whole being.

Eyes wait for us to direct them toward the people we love, the hearts within them, and the beauty of their souls.

Freud was right about the significance of love and work. 

But do add this, as Shakespeare put it:

“Love looks not with the eyes, but with the mind; And therefore is wing’d Cupid painted blind.

==========

The Mirror Baby was sourced from Wikimedia Commons. It is the work of roseoftimothywoods.

The Value of Denial and Distraction: Where Therapists Can Go Wrong

Big Eyes

One of my mentors (TE) was a psychiatrist of immense intellect and a laser’s capacity to cut to a psychiatric diagnosis. His brilliance as a diagnostician, however, did not extend to gently bringing his well-defended patients down the therapeutic path.

This man was a surgeon of the mind.

Surgeons leave scars.

Think of psychotherapy’s beginning as a kind of dance, with the patient in motion like Salome, covered with seven veils. Her wraps and shifting movement are for protection, not seduction. The client, female or male, is wary, and the covering — any covering — guards against invasion.

Should a doctor rip the gauzy garments away, he does an injury. Without a shield, the individual is exposed, terrified, and likely to flee treatment.

Too much too soon.

A thoughtful mental health professional doesn’t drain a protective moat until the client develops the courage to take on the scary world outside his castle (or inside his head). The counselor must avoid retraumatizing the sufferer, in effect flooding him with emotions he is unprepared for.

The irony of hurting when you mean to help could not be more poignant or more terrible.

Young therapists can miss this. So do managed care companies when they want you to push treatment as fast as possible (to cut its cost) or medicate the insured party for the identical reason. TE was guilty of ignoring the same therapeutic speed bump.

The challenge of focusing on life’s dark side was understood by the mathematical genius Blaise Pascal, who died just before the age of 40 in 1662. The Frenchman recognized the need to divert oneself from contemplation of the human condition. Students of clinical psychology might still benefit from his words. For example:

Being unable to cure death, wretchedness, and ignorance, men have decided, in order to be happy, not to think about such things.

Or this:

I have often said that the sole cause of man’s unhappiness is that he does not know how to stay quietly in his room.

In short, the world can overwhelm creatures as small and vulnerable as ourselves. Those in most need of distraction are among the least inclined to make use of this necessary method in the pursuit of equanimity.

Pascal again:

However sad a man may be, if you can persuade him to take up some diversion he will be happy while it lasts, and however happy a man may be, if he lacks diversion and has no absorbing passion or entertainment to keep boredom away, he will soon be depressed and unhappy. Without diversion there is no joy; with diversion there is no sadness.

I’d say Pascal goes too far, but his point is a worthy one. I can name many people who seem content (at least for the moment) because they don’t think about the shadow following them down the street. Perhaps trouble at work or home, with children, or the big concern:

Death.

A memorable patient of mine found escape in distraction and denial, eating enough carbohydrates to push her well into obesity and diabetes. Yet, while feeding, she felt at peace. During stressful moments, this lady believed she deserved a treat as compensation for her upset.

The therapist seeks a balance between accepting the other’s ever-ready psychological defenses and gradually helping them to recognize the long-term damage they are doing to themselves by not facing problems. With the sizable woman in question, it was quite a tightrope walk.

I find myself on both sides of the balance beam.

Socrates was right when he said, “The unexamined life is not worth living.” So, however, was Pascal, by implying the deleterious effects of too much examination, rumination, and painful memory. The truth is hard to swallow, as the kid in the top photo is about to discover.

Were I to create my own mantra, I’d alter the inscription on the Temple of Apollo, which reads: “Know Thyself.”

A less pithy version would be:

“Know thyself, but not all in one bite. 

“Remember: Your potential for self-awareness is bigger than your stomach for it.”

My Early, Imaginary Sex Life and Other Thoughts About Growing Up

Examples from the history of a life might answer the question of whether we are born or made. Whether we are screwed up from the start, unscrew ourselves, or are unscrewed with the help of others.

Some of us are wise, brave, and kind from the start, of course.

Nonetheless, youth can be a screwing-up experience all by itself. Though some of the time is wonderful, everything is new, lots of mistakes are made, and an audience of endless judgment seems ever-present.

Moreover, there is this:

The General Science teacher in the first year of high school was Sidney Rothstein. Here was a man over 40, tall, built to the point of rugged muscularity, and displaying a presence not to be messed with.

Mr. R. introduced himself by telling the class that he might make blunders when grading the tests he prepared and scored. Sid followed up this admission of imperfection by saying we should tell him if we found any such errors.

Then came the kicker. The haughty figure added that if his mistakes were found, he would not change our grade.

Adults, it seemed to me at the time, were creatures as strange and inexplicable as children—maybe more.

Earlier on, as a small boy, an unspoken concern occurred to me: Why was I me? Why weren’t my thoughts in another body, within a different person, or perhaps lodged in someone in the world’s past or future?

The 15th century came to mind for no particular reason.

Later I learned about evolution, but the existential question remained unanswered. In its way, this might have been my first thought about the randomness of human existence.

I don’t recall any of this being mentioned in Biology class, and I never raised the issue there. I do, however, remember one incident. It was the day Afton Scroggins, our teacher and a man of the South, turned back our first graded test.

He had written a note on mine.

I would have had 100%, but he took off a few points because I didn’t write my homeroom number at the top of the page. Yes, he had required us to do this. My failure taught me to listen to instructions with care and attend to details.

At age 14, a new friend showed me the condom he carried in his wallet. This was before any kid I knew had experience with sex. I suppose it was a kind of badge of honor or a sign of hope—the hope he would get lucky.

Another complicating factor in our imaginary love lives was walking to the pharmacy to buy a prophylactic. There was no internet to ease the purchase. The potential face-to-face embarrassment made it feel like a death march.

We lacked both the item and someone to use it with. The never-before-attempted process of finding a comely, compatible, and cooperative female heightened the emotional whirlwind.

Plus, do realize, sex was in our brains, in our body, implied in TV ads, in our eyes, taking us over, and everywhere inescapable. Unyielding, unstoppable, and relentless.

Sigmund Freud described another part of our problem. “What do women want?” he wrote, but never provided a satisfying answer.

My buddies and I shared puzzlement about how to approach the girls we knew, but were just as clueless as Dr. Sigmund. His death in 1939 prevented us from asking his help in getting a condom. Geez, I thought—at least he could have left us some guidance about that.

The early 1960s, prior to the Sexual Revolution, presented us with the connection between the words condom and condemn. What would the pharmacist say? What would a neighbor or our parents say if they found out?

I knew what the Catholic priest would say, and I wasn’t even Catholic.

Most of us were paralyzed by all this—daunted for as long as it lasted.

Years later, at a high school reunion, a female friend from days past said the girls were waiting at the telephone, wondering why they weren’t being called.

Upon the further awakening of our bodies and entering the playing field of dating, we also addressed the issue of unprotected sex, possible impregnation of the female, and even disease.

Theoretically.

For a while there was talk of the rhythm method of birth control.

As for myself, I wasn’t sure I could keep a beat.

Somehow one survives high school, but at the time it is like running the gauntlet.

We were, without doubt, a studious and thoughtful bunch. I’d guess most of us were preoccupied with possibilities, many of which might lead to some form of public or private humiliation.

The males who were less reflective had a better chance of engagement in the various forms of youthful romance. That, and any of us who became the target of a take-charge young woman’s desire for sexual experimentation.

On the plus side, though we might have been slow to get to the erotic firing line, we did well in school. Three of our group of 10 earned Ph.Ds., two J.Ds., one M.D., plus a veterinarian. The remaining three, every bit as bright, all obtained Master’s degrees.

Better still, we created a college scholarship fund in the year 2000 at our alma mater. By the time we dissolved it about 16 years later, we had awarded over a quarter of a million dollars to needy students, more money than the other 50+ graduating classes had donated in the school’s history.

Combined.

Is there a moral to this story?

Simple. We were lucky, learned to play fair, and were born at the right moment in history. Our group had decent working-class parents, lived in a land of opportunity, and discovered how to open doors for ourselves and, later, for others.

Because it was right. Because it was our responsibility and still is.

Back to my childhood question about why my being and identity—the me in the body that carried me—didn’t live in the 15th century and belong to someone else.

I’m sure I wouldn’t have been involved in creating a college scholarship program or becoming a clinical psychologist. What I’d have missed most, however, were the 10 teen friends I made five centuries ahead, nine of whom survive, and seven of whom stay in touch today, over 60 years later.

==========

All of the images are sourced from Wikimedia Commons. At the top is a Plastic Dowel for Screw by Emilian Robert Vicol.

The next one is a demonstration of the Traditional action of the “Archimedean screw” (invented in Ancient Egypt or Ancient Greece) pumping water up by Silberwolf. Finally, a photo of A Globule of Liquid Water by José Manuel Suárez.

When It is Better Not to Know

We prefer not to know some things, and others are better left unknown regardless of our level of interest. Then there are those issues for which the answer requires living the experience.

For example, the opinions others have about you, in detail. All of it, including the jokes.

Imagine that your best friend’s partner is secretly seeing someone else; would you be wise to tell your buddy?

Do you wish your surgeon to be sensitive to injuries, worry for fear of harming his patients, and haunted by self-blame in the operating room? Might an MD ideally be certain of his skills, confident, and without empathic sensitivity?

Is there value in telling a young person what aging is like? The object would be to prepare him for what is ahead. Assuming you do, will he believe you, or continue to think of himself as invulnerable and ageless?

What should you say when your child asks whether Santa Claus is real? My eldest daughter asked me at age seven, and the truth left her in tears.

Ought you to inform your children about your worries, fears, and upset with the other partner who raises you? Does reversing the roles of parent and offspring help either one?

How would life be impacted if you remembered every happiness and sadness? Most will fade, and some will vanish on their own.

Is it helpful if you hold a grudge forever? The old saying reminds us that if you seek revenge, dig two graves. There are two of you involved, aren’t there?

Do you want a therapist who cries with you and experiences your suffering just as you do? Does this improve or diminish his ability as a counselor?

What is the right response when your patient says she is in love with you?

Is there an acceptable reason to hug a client?

What is appropriate when a beautiful, late 20s patient hands you a paper bag full of various condoms and sex toys?

Is your attitude toward climate change affected by remembering when the sky was almost always a deep blue with pure white cumulus clouds? An earlier birthdate might have been required.

Was the world of males in fedora hats, ties, and reading newspapers on a commuter train or bus a less stressful life? The TV series Mad Men offered a version of that time and place.

Did the Internet make for more harm than good? Do you recall the time before it existed?

Well now, I don’t suggest you ponder this any further. Take it for as little or as much as you want.

One thing, I hope. At least a few of you were entertained.

That’s the best I can do for now.

I have to go.

You wouldn’t want to know why. 😊

———-

The Question Marks is a work by Jerome Paniel, sourced from Wikimedia Commons.

The Corrosive Nature of Disrespect

We live in the day of shouting, name-calling, and rudeness. Such things make it a proper day to discuss respect.

Interrupting speech, also called talking over the speaker, was once considered discourteous but is now acceptable.

Intolerant disagreement is frequent. Civility has been under pressure since the end of the last century, correlated with the rise of the Internet.

Children mimic the trend, dismissive and contemptuous of classmates, reducing them in size, and bringing them to despair.

People work from home, and some stay there except for errands, walking the dog, and other necessities.

Making friends and going outside the fortress of one’s residence carries a risk in a world perceived as toxic.

No wonder so many sense that they are unseen and uncared for, with little experience of belonging.

Humans have become replacement parts. Their placement on the dumpster pile replaces their voice with a thud.

When the castle’s inhabitants peer down from on high, the faceless crowd below can be counted and considered for their utility. The palace’s inhabitants cheer on the unthinkable, and a surprising number of those considered underlings join in the carnage.

Why?

Hannah Arendt, philosopher and historian, remarked:

Before you can do the unthinkable to people, you have to make them superfluous, stripped of any place in the world where their existence matters to anyone.

Think about the implications of such a statement. It can apply to both those who will be victims and those who terrorize the vulnerable.

Let’s examine the latter.

People who are shunned, considered uneducated, and who work modest jobs in unfamiliar towns often have their ideas dismissed as worthless.

If Arendt is correct, when we ignore, reject, or belittle them, they are more likely to seek validation and attach to those in high places who appear to take their side.

To Arendt, “a person in that condition will reach for anything that restores a sense of significance, any movement that says ‘You are not nothing. You are part of something vast, something that is going to remake the world.'”

—–

Listening, ever since the last century, has become an act of kindness, and of community. A receptive ear is a sort of restorative potion and elixir for our tribalism. At least one step toward a worthwhile end.

“Attention is the rarest and purest form of generosity,” wrote the French philosopher and activist Simone Weil.

In listening, we should observe our companion. Eye movements, tone of voice, changes in body position, smiles, tears, unstill hands and tremulous feet.

Weil offered suggestions on how best to listen.

Rather than an urgent preoccupation with what she would say to the one sitting near her, Weil tried to subtract herself, becoming both a sponge and mirror to absorb and reflect the other’s words and feelings.

She conveyed her regard for their value.

Mortals live to be afforded consideration as individuals of significance, not out of narcissism but out of necessity and the desire for companionship. Where this is lacking, they tend to welcome a place in any club that will applaud their membership—a spot for themselves.

Even better, to join a movement larger than life that offers self-esteem.

We search for logic in the troubling actions of others, assuming we are the logical ones. We call those who don’t side with us stupid, thinking them suckers when they cheer the grandiose and do their bidding.

Yet if the people one has depended on have failed you, perhaps it is not so illogical to believe in someone — anyone — who recognizes your pain. They offer you the attention you have longed for.

Hope supersedes despair. Being seen supersedes invisibility. Acceptance and stature supersede logic.

For many years, Industry and government have looked down their nose at those who cannot climb the lengthening rope up to the American Dream. The promise of a better life than their parents has been broken.

Ignored, they largely remained docile. Unquiet, the word “deplorables “ was attached to them by someone who should have known better. Others diminished the same group for clinging “to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them”

We, the people of the United States of America, rendered judgment. We, the people who were doing better, distanced ourselves from those who were not.

Perhaps we have begun to realize this.

———-

The top photo is of Simone Weil at age 13 in Knokke-le-Zoute, Belgium, summer 1922. The final image is the logo of World Logic Day. It is the work of Jean-Yves Beziau. Both of these were sourced from Wikimedia Commons.

Naming the BEST Names in 250 Years

Today I am asking you a favor. Please name a few of your favorite Americans over our last 250 years. One or two would be wonderful.

People to celebrate.

Here are a few of mine:

Eleanor Roosevelt, FDR, George O’Keeffe, Jackie Robinson, Jonas Salk, Barbara Jordan, Dwight Eisenhower, Judy Collins, Thomas Paine, Leonard Bernstein, James Baldwin, Edward R. Morrow, Rosa Parks, Abraham Lincoln, Joni Mitchell, Jimmy Carter, Renee Good, Alex Pretti, John Lewis, MLK, Pete Seeger, Mark Rothko, Frederick Douglass, and Gutzon Borglum (the sculptor who created Mt. Rushmore).

The idea comes from my sparkling friend Joan Chandler in her July 4th blog. You can read her list and her brief post by clicking on the link.

There was a time when “naming names” referred to U.S. Congressmen who served on the House Committee on Un-American Activities in the 1940s and ’50s.

The members requested that Hollywood actors, writers, producers, and others identify prominent associates, including close friends, who attended left-wing meetings or joined the Communist Party.

Those who refused to do what the panel demanded, movie stars among them, suffered blacklisting. Being on such lists prevented them from finding work, practicing their craft, displaying their talent, and making a living.

It did not matter that Communism had been popular in the United States during the Great Depression of the 1930s, when the economy collapsed, and some believed democracy and capitalism failed them.

McCarthyism became a simultaneous anticommunist force, fueling fear and promoting loyalty oaths to establish patriotic citizenship. According to AI, Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy and his cronies often made “baseless, sensationalized accusations of disloyalty, subversion, or treason, particularly concerning alleged communist infiltration.”

The 1950s were called the period of the Red Scare, referring to suspected communists as Reds.

Today is a different day, and the first iteration of the Red Scare is over, though serpents are not hard to find.

Let us praise and celebrate those Americans who have brought us honor thus far, 250 years since our founding.

Please allow me to add to my list a woman who fought against powerful men who made females second-class citizens, even before the Women’s Movement.

I forgot to mention her name earlier. She belongs on my roll call, for sure:

Joan Chandler.

==========

Freedom of Speech, the 1943 painting at the top of the page, was the first of four oil paintings titled Four Freedoms by Norman Rockwell.

The Persistence of Hope

Our country remains hopeful. Despite many obstacles, we are among those who came here seeking a better life. Preceding us, our ancestors made their hope into reality. Indeed, the Native Americans first built lives here, aware of their partnership with the land they lived on. They respected the bounty of the precious ground on which they flourished before white men arrived.

George Bernard Shaw offered these words in his play “Back to Methuselah.”

I hear you say ‘Why?’ Always ‘Why?’ You see things; and you say ‘Why?’ But I dream things that never were; and I say ‘Why not?’

We still live in a world of possibilities.

Nonetheless, the American Psychological Association’s 2025 study, Stress in America 2025: A Crisis of Connection, finds significant evidence of loneliness, uncertainty, and worry about the future, including AI.

The APA’s paper also suggests that the toll of our societal division is matched by our resilience. The report states that “while (we are) burdened by stress and uncertainty, (the population) continues to hold fast to hope, agency and a belief in progress — both personal and collective.”

The world of 60 years ago was not so different.

On June 8, 1968, Senator Edward (Ted) Kennedy delivered this eulogy for his brother, Robert F. (Bobby) Kennedy. You will find the audio and text provided by the John F. Kennedy Library at the link above.

Bobby’s junior brother reminded us of Robert’s belief in who we are and the responsibilities that fall to us. His hopefulness in a 1966 speech applies today:

“Our future may lie beyond our vision, but it is not completely beyond our control. It is the shaping impulse of America that neither fate nor nature nor the irresistible tides of history, but the work of our own hands, matched to reason and principle, that will determine our destiny. There is pride in that, even arrogance, but there is also experience and truth. In any event, it is the only way we can live.”

In closing his tribute, Ted Kennedy called to mind his sibling’s love of George Bernard Shaw’s words:

As he said many times, in many parts of this nation, to those he touched and who sought to touch him:

‘Some men see things as they are and say why.
I dream things that never were and say why not.’

I hope you listen to the eulogy or read it. Prepare to be touched and uplifted.

===========

The first painting is Gustav Klimt’s Hope II from the Museum of Modern Art. Below is George Frederic Watts’s Hope from the Tate Museum. 

When Our Mates Don’t See, Hear, or Remember

Blind Monks Examining an Elephant by Itcho Hanabusa.

Some of those closest to us are members of a particular club.

  • They fail to grasp something essential in human relationships, a deficiency that involves misunderstanding significant realities.
  • They listen to what you say but do not grasp your meaning.
  • Conversations of considerable seriousness, events you recall in detail, drift away from them, slipping out of reach like a bar of soap on a shower floor.

The person in question is not lacking intelligence. He lacks sensitivity because he doesn’t grasp vulnerability.

During my psychotherapy practice, some patients who had made every effort to achieve understanding from their mate asked what else they might do.

My response?

They don’t make mallets that big.

Those they love may be decent, helpful, and bright. Over time, however, comes the dawn of recognition about their companion:

They don’t get it, and never will.

While engaged in work, tennis, or computer gaming with relentless fervor, other concerns are absent and beyond cognizance. Ignoring diet, overlooking health, perhaps something goes missing. The needed human qualities exist elsewhere.

These souls are in denial and capable of dissociation. Their thoughts, feelings, memories, and actions sometimes detach from one another.

Since they are incapable of recognizing the tenderness of your nature and the pain they cause, pleading with them is like talking to a wall.

Leonardo da Vinci described the experience of seeing an artwork, not realizing he depicted the human tendency to slice off parts of the world too uncomfortable to grasp:

“Painting is poetry that is seen rather than felt, and poetry is painting that is felt rather than seen.”

A parent with characteristics similar to those noted above may make home life challenging. Many children have no choice but to shut their eyes, cover their heads, stop their ears, and jump into a foxhole until the sights, sounds, and memories fade.

The years may be endurable, but the danger to the child is becoming a replica of the mom or dad whose presence led them to guard themselves against portions of the emotional world. Their capacity to understand those who offer intimacy and a broader spectrum of sentiments is compromised. 

Pain in another becomes imperceptible, unfelt; it is not ascertained or recollected. Expecting more than that resembles speaking to an alien from outer space. Language is inadequate to bridge the gap.

Despite this, those who choose this type of partner go through the early romance phase in a normal fashion. The triple burst of passion, newness, and the best behavior is attractive.

Later, life together settles into a routine: house cleaning, clashes like those in movies, and frank exhaustion while trying to be seen and understood. Hope and affection build patience, but unmentioned questions emerge:

Does he know me? Does he like me? Is he in love with me?

Desperate and unhappy spouses do well to take off their sunglasses, removing the blindness of love with them. Except, of course, when illusions are preferable.

———-

Blind Monks Examining an Elephant by Itcho Hanabusa was created in 1888. It was sourced from Wikimedia Commons and comes from the Library of Congress.

What We are Looking For

I cannot explain it. I cannot recreate it. I can only tell you that I didn’t know what I was looking for, but, nonetheless, it was what I found.

Twice?

I found it first in silence, at college. The young woman I loved, after an evening of affection, sat a few feet apart from me as we looked at each other in silence. Neither of us averted our eyes during an hour in the stillness. There was no plan or agreement. It just happened.

I could say we created a sacred space, the space around us and between us. I might offer that, but I am not sure what it means. It seemed that something more was there, more than what could be defined, transcendence from one state to another, floating and ethereal.

Together, but innocent.

Much later, in a relationship at a distance with a different woman, the two of us unconsciously erased the miles by creating a bridge of words, and sometimes a beam of voices. We lived for this tightrope and met each other there when geography separated us.

Not so easy, you say? You are right. But we came to see each other without sight, understanding each other beyond knowledge and surfaces. We were vulnerable, missed our missing fathers, and honest to the point of painfulness.

The words do not do the relationship justice. They never do.

I retain friends from fifth grade and later, as well as from high school. I retain buddies, period, you might say, and have platonic love for some of them. With many, there is atypical openness. It helps to be a clinical psychologist.

I am lucky to have my children and grandchildren close by, the former after years away, mostly at school.

If heaven awaits as good as advertised, I will welcome it. In the meantime, in an uneasy world, I look for friendship, silent communion, ways to repair the world, spontaneous laughter, and the chance to say “I love you.”

I laugh with physical therapists and MDs, too. Sometimes one can make necessities into opportunities, at least a bit. In life, there is no free lunch. Lives must be shaped, reshaped, and adapted. We must live and love “despite.”

Do as much as you can in the time you have.

Join the club if you can. No requirements.

It is spring, after all.

============

The image is Alphonse Mucha’s Spring,1896, sourced from Wikiart.org/

Regret and the “Could Have Been” Man

At some point in my young life, my mother said, “Regret is a painkiller for fools.”

I don’t recall asking her to explain herself, but I believe she referred to two possible responses to one’s past.

First, there is the sadness and lingering wish that comes with mistakes or missed opportunities.

Second, the regretful apology some offer after injuring you.

Whatever mom intended, her choice of words and the way she spoke them revealed bitterness—even contempt—for those who allowed themselves to be preoccupied with the unchangeable past.

The guidance implicit in those six words described her attitude toward life. There was no looking back at the days gone by, except as a complicated experience. Instead, she lived in the present.

Beyond defending her family, Jeanette Stein offered intolerance and unforgiveness to those who injured her, writing them out of her life without the possibility of reconsideration or return.

—–

We can grieve losses and mistakes. Often, we can apologize. In the absence of direct communication with the injured party, confession is available. Both therapy and some religions encourage it.

Yet long past disappointments must be approached differently. The “if only” quality of self-blame and lost time is often addressed by recognizing at least three things.

Life does not permit the fulfillment of every wish, and chance can change everything.

People tend to exaggerate the perfection and transformative virtue of the road not taken. The avenue not pursued often towers over everything else we accomplished. It shimmers in our idealizing imagination. The path we chose, in contrast, is imperfect: the wrong choice, so we believe.

One must make the most of what the world offers in the moment, accepting our imperfect wisdom and limited ability to predict the future.

Recognizing the remaining possibilities is the essential next step.

Add to this formula Rilke’s poetic reminder of what to do:

You must change your life.

Marcus Aurelius, the Roman Emperor and Stoic philosopher, offered similar advice:

Waste no more time arguing  (with yourself) what a good man should be. Be one.

Now on to a gentleman named James. The YouTube video below offers a six-minute example of a wistfully regretful life, but not a desperate one. This chap describes his history and what disappoints him about himself as he reflects upon the darkness and shadows of his past.

Despite James’s self-denigration, I hope you notice a tiny spark of possibility. More about this after the video.

James wears his Scot bonnet tam with a flair. It reinforces his impeccable taste. This Irishman lived on three continents and moved from his country to London. At the same time, he tells the interviewer that he is “the greatest failure who ever walked the planet earth.”

Another might say his tale is more than usually interesting.

Our hero’s list of failures includes no profession, no money, no wife, and no friends. He is the “could have been” man.

With enough money to be stylish, the care he takes in using the photographer’s name, and the gift of making people laugh, James is not without talents.

His biggest problem might be a preoccupation with what could have been, himself, his loneliness, and a belief that his story is over.

Over or yet to be?

As Rilke and Marcus tell us, the ink is not dry, and blank pages in the book of our lives stare back at us, waiting.

Write.

============

The top image is a 1916 self-portrait of Egon Schiele.