When the Best Action is Inaction

Conventional wisdom tells us to step forward, assert ourselves, and take decisive action. Not so fast. Sometimes, stretching time, holding the moment in place, and waiting is best.

I learned this lesson from a bunch of inner-city kids as their 20-year-old summer camp counselor: when to react and when to do nothing.

Like lots of things in life, the instruction came by accident.

My unintentional tutors were males coming into their teens. All lived in Cambridge, Massachusetts, and enrolled in the M.I.T. Science Camp during the summer of 1967.

Despite the name, academics had no part in the daily doings. The fledgling young men came from troubled homes and dangerous neighborhoods. Most of them were aged 12 to 15 years, black and white.

Names like Paul and Tom and Eddie and Biff. The last of these was already chain-smoking before he reached 13.

Some were shy; a few were petty criminals, and one or two were learning disabled. We had an angry handful and several who were dazed by the demands of living. Still, the adults hoped the youngsters might benefit from the experience.

Each counselor, all college students, had charge of a handful of the boys. My group of six joined a similar bunch led by another counselor, Geoff Smith. Geoff, a swell fellow, was bright and easy to work with.

Geoff and I took our charges on day trips to Martha’s Vineyard and New York City. We played some baseball and put on a play under the direction of a Boston College undergraduate theater major, Betty Rose. We had just enough bodies to recreate “Twelve Angry Men.” The several weeks made for an enjoyable and productive summer.

One day, Geoff had a dentist appointment, so I led both of our groups: perhaps a total of 10 kids on the morning he was away.

We walked through M.I.T.’s Building Seven when one of the older boys signaled his buddies to run in different directions. The group had come to a four-way intersection, offering multiple flight paths for escape. In a flash, they disappeared. I stood at the crossroads and peered down each hallway.

Nothing.

Not one could be seen.

The boys’ safety was on my mind, but retrieving them all seemed impossible. I didn’t move. At best, any direction might have led to only a few. I did nothing, not because I was brilliant or possessed patience, but because I couldn’t think of a solution.

Perhaps you’ve guessed that I stumbled upon the right course: waiting. Had I started down any of the corridors, I’d probably still be running after them. Since I didn’t take the bait, no “chase” materialized. They got bored.

Within 10 minutes, all returned to the spot where I still stood like a statue, fixed in position since the moment the kids sped away. We proceeded to our appointed destination without comment.

—–

Over 17 years later, my wife and I hoped to purchase a new home. The owner didn’t use a real estate agent, so we drove to his residence to settle on a price. I sat at his kitchen table, and he reminded me of the amount he’d listed in his ad. 

I was silent and expressionless.

I said nothing for several seconds, just looking at him. He spoke again and named a lower price.

I was silent.

More time passed.

He lowered the dollar value once more.

By now, he was offering the house for a number beneath what my wife and I agreed was acceptable before we met with him.

I waited until he stopped undercutting himself and agreed to his diminished offer. We still live in the home we purchased that day.

Sometimes, problems work themselves out if you don’t interfere. When quiet is uncomfortable for someone, he may take action to reduce his discomfort, as did the former owner of my home.

As best I can understand what happened, this fellow believed my lack of response indicated I was unhappy with the price he stated. He assumed my failure to speak demonstrated dissatisfaction with each new proposal. If he had simply stopped reducing the offer, we would have paid more than we did. I was comfortable with waiting; he was not.

—–

Athletes say “slowing the game down” in pressured moments prevents anxiety and adrenalin from taking them over. Otherwise, they lose control and deliver a poor performance out of desperation. One way to reduce the jitters is to take one or two deep breaths, having practiced these earlier in training to combat nervousness.

Public speaking is another common tension-filled situation. Upon reaching the podium, accomplished orators hesitate, typically letting the applause finish and any conversation in the audience end. Among those seated, the most interested in what is to come often shush the talkers, thus creating the atmosphere and expectation the speaker wants. By doing nothing but standing there, he has taken charge.

A symphony conductor does much the same thing. When he turns to face the orchestra, he scans the 100 players, waiting for their eyes to meet his. Not until he achieves their focus will he raise his baton.

If the crowd doesn’t silence itself, he may turn to face them again. The preparation to make everything ready for the first note happens without words. Since the attendees purchased tickets for the performance, the pressure on them grows to permit the concert to start.

Silence, inaction, and eye contact have the power to control. These characteristics suggest the stationary figure is confident in holding his ground. Even in my stint as an uncertain summer camp counselor, every boy deferred to the necessity of returning to the group.

Slow down. Be patient. Try to live with uncertainty. Don’t act impulsively. Master temper and anxiety. Wait, wait, and take a breath. Avoid action for its own sake.

Haste may worsen an already bad situation. Assertiveness is not always the answer. Patience might be better — much better — than misguided energy.

People can be similar to boomerangs. Like the kids I mentioned, with enough time and a bit of luck, they return.

=========

The top painting is Time Transfixed by Rene Magritte, 1938. Next comes Henry Moore’s Sculpture from 1935. Both are from the Art Institute of Chicago. They are followed by Laura Hedien’s recent photograph of the Milky Way in Arizona with her permission: Laura Hedien Official Website. Finally, Mark Rothko’s Orange and Tan of 1954.

He Who Hesitates is NOT Always Lost

Peter_P_Gudo_the_great_thinker

I learned a valuable lesson from a bunch of inner-city kids as their 20-year-old summer camp counselor: when to take action and when to do nothing and wait.

Like lots of things in life, the instruction came by accident.

My unintending tutors were all kids who lived in Cambridge, Massachusetts, enrolled in the MIT Science Camp during the summer of 1967. My friend Rich Adelstein, an MIT undergrad, had helped to create the enterprise and got me the job to oversee six of them.

Despite the name, academics had no part in the daily doings. The kids came from troubled homes and tough neighborhoods. Most of them were aged 12 to 15-years. Some were shy, a few petty criminals, and one or two learning disabled. We had an angry handful and several who seemed rather dazed by the demands of living. Still, the adults hoped all of youngsters might benefit from the experience.

Each counselor, almost all MIT students, had charge of a few of the boys. No girls allowed back then. Many of the activities of my group of six happened in cooperation with another counselor, Geoff Smith. Geoff, a swell fellow, was smart and easy to get along with. We worked well together.

Geoff and I took our charges on day-trips to Martha’s Vineyard and New York City. We played some baseball and put on a play under the direction of a Boston College undergraduate theater major, Betty Rose. We had just enough bodies to recreate “Twelve Angry Men.” The seven weeks made for a fun and productive summer.

One day Geoff had a dentist appointment, so I led both of our groups: perhaps a total of 10 kids on the morning he was away.

We walked through MIT’s Building Seven when one of the older boys signaled the others to run in different directions. The group had come to a four-way intersection, offering multiple flight paths for escape. In a flash they disappeared. I stood at the crossroads and looked down each hallway. Nothing. Nobody.

The safety of these boys was on my mind, but what was I to do? I froze. Any path I chose would, at best, avail me only a few of them. I did nothing, not because I reasoned out a clever idea, but because I couldn’t think of a good solution.

Perhaps you’ve guessed that I stumbled upon the right course: waiting. Had I started down any one of the corridors I’d probably still be running. Since I didn’t, the “chase” didn’t materialize and they got bored. In 10-minutes time all returned on their own. We proceeded to our appointed destination without comment.

Sometimes problems work themselves out if you don’t interfere. If you stop chasing someone, he stops running from you. You can drive people away in pursuing them, whether by your ardor or anger.

Slow down. Be patient. Try to live with uncertainty. Don’t act impulsively. Master your temper and anxiety. Wait, wait, and take a breath. Action for the sake of action doesn’t make sense. You can worsen an already bad situation. Assertiveness is not always the answer. Patience might be better — much better — than misguided energy.

People can be similar to boomerangs. Like these kids, with enough time and a bit of luck they come back to you.

The top photo is Peter P. Gudo, the Great Thinker by Mr. Thinker. It is sourced from Wikimedia Commons. This post is a revised version of one I wrote five years ago.

To Wait, or to Wait: That is the Question

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a7/Hesitation.jpg/256px-Hesitation.jpg

I was taught a valuable lesson by a bunch of inner-city kids when I was their 20-year-old summer camp counselor. The lesson was about when and whether to take action; and when and whether to do nothing and wait. But let me tell you the story…

The job was in Cambridge, Massachusetts, the home of Harvard and MIT. Although I was attending the U of Illinois, my friend Rich Adelstein was then involved in something called the “MIT Science Camp.” I never really found out what science had to do with it, because it wasn’t much different from any other summer camp, but for a few things having nothing to do with science. First, of course, it was at MIT, one of the world’s premier institutions of higher learning; a place where only the elite young minds already proficient in science were allowed to matriculate. And because of that, it was not an “outdoor” oriented summer camp, although we did do the usual things like playing baseball. But perhaps the most important distinction between this summer camp and most of those you might have heard about or attended, was the fact that it was for underprivileged kids from troubled homes and tough neighborhoods. Most of them were in the 12 to 15-year-old range. Some were shy, some were petty criminals, some were learning disabled, some were angry, and some were lost. But, it was thought that all of them might still benefit from the camp experience.

The counselors were all about my age, and all of them were MIT undergraduates with two exceptions: myself and a Harvard student. The kids were recommended by their schools. The project was funded by money then available as part of the “Great Society” vision of LBJ, otherwise known as President Lyndon Baines Johnson. The camp itself was supervised by a psychiatrist, Dr. Warren Brody. The year was 1967.

Many of the activities of my group of six kids were done in cooperation with another counselor, Geoff Smith. Geoff was a swell fellow, smart and easy to get along with, and we worked well together. We had money for some outings with the boys (all the kids in the camp were male) and even took them on a day trip to Martha’s Vineyard and another excursion to New York City, where we watched the Rockettes in Radio City Music Hall at Rockefeller Center. As I said, we played some baseball and also put on a play under the direction of a Boston College undergraduate theater major, Betty Rose. It was “Twelve Angry Men.” We had just enough players, and these kids were thereby exposed to performance. A fun summer was had by all.

On the day in question Geoff had a morning dentist appointment, so I was in charge of both of our groups. Depending on the day, not all the kids would necessarily be there. I imagine on this particular day, there were probably 10 of them present.

I was walking with the kids through Building 7 when one of the older ones quickly instructed the others to run in different directions. We had come to a four-way intersection, so there were four possible flight paths down which each kid could escape. In a flash they were gone. As I stood at the intersection and looked in each direction not one was to be seen.

Remember, I was 20 years old and in charge of these lives. Their safety was my responsibility. But what was I to do? Even though I was rattled, I was still smart enough to know that any direction I chose would, at best, avail me the possibility of finding only two or three or four kids. For the life of me, I didn’t know what to do, so I did nothing. Not because I thought that was a clever idea, but because I couldn’t think of any good solution.

Perhaps you’ve guessed that I had stumbled upon precisely the right course: inaction. In fact, it was the only solution. If I had started running down any one of the corridors, I’d probably still be running. But because I didn’t, the kids found that the “chase” they’d hoped for hadn’t materialized, and they weren’t having any fun. In the space of 10 minutes they were all back where they started and we proceeded on to our appointed destination.

Sometimes life is like that. If you stop chasing a thing or a person, it stops running away from you. You can drive people away in your pursuit, be it romantic or angry.

Slow down. Be patient. See if you can live with uncertainty. Don’t act impulsively. Wait, wait, wait and see… Take a breath. Action for the sake of action doesn’t make sense. You can actually make things worse. Assertiveness is not always the answer. Sometimes inaction is better — much better — than action.

A lot of things in life, like those kids, are like boomerangs — they come back to you.

At least, they sometimes have for me.

The top image is called Hesitation by Alfred Garth Jones, sourced from Wikimedia Commons.